Product Descriptionp/pP?€œIWestmoreland /Iis a great book, a classic by an author who knows his subject well and tells the story without hesitation.?€ ?€” General Donn A. Starry, U.S. Army (ret.), Commander, Army Training and Doctrine Command (1977?€“1981)brBRIs it possible that the riddle of America?€™s military failure in Vietnam has a one-word, one-man answer?brBRUnless and until we understand General William Westmoreland, we will never understand what went wrong in Vietnam. An Eagle Scout at fifteen, First Captain of his West Point class, Westmoreland fought in two wars and became Superintendent at West Point. Then he was chosen to lead the war effort in Vietnam for four crucial years./P pHe proved a disaster. He could not think creatively about unconventional warfare, chose an unavailing strategy, stuck to it in the face of all opposition, and stood accused of fudging the results when it mattered most. In this definitive portrait, Lewis Sorley makes a plausible case that the war could have been won were it not for Westmoreland. The tragedy of William Westmoreland carries lessons not just for Vietnam, but for the future of American leadership./P pIWestmoreland /Iis essential reading from a masterly historian.p/pAmazon.com Reviewp/pspan class="h1"strong Amazon Exclusive: A Q&A with Author Lewis Sorley/strong/span br / br / img src="http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/HomifEMS/Sorley_Westmoreland.jpg" border="0" align="right" pstrongQ:/strong How can the loss of Vietnam be blamed on Westmoreland? pstrong A:/strong He served for four years as U.S. commander there during the crucial period of the buildup of American ground forces, a flood that eventually reached 543,400 due to Westmoreland?€™s repeated requests for more and more troops. Given a free hand in deciding how to conduct the war within South Vietnam, he chose to pursue an unavailing war of attrition, which failed miserably. Westmoreland thus squandered four years of support by Congress, much of the American people, and even the media./p brstrongQ:/strong How did a man as limited as Westmoreland achieve such high rank and position?br/ pstrongA:/strong Fueled by ambition, Westmoreland drove himself relentlessly. He was of impressive military mien, energetic, effective at self-promotion, and skillful in cultivating influential sponsors. From his earliest days of service he led his contemporaries, was admired and advanced by his seniors, and progressed rapidly upward. Westmoreland?€™s strengths eventually propelled him to a level beyond his understanding and abilities./p pstrongQ:/strong What was Westmoreland?€™s approach as commander of U.S. forces in Vietnam?/p pstrongA:/strong Westmoreland decided to conduct a war of attrition in which the measure of merit would be body count, the number of enemy killed. His premise was that if he killed enough of their soldiers, the enemy would lose heart and cease its aggression against South Vietnam. He went about this primarily through the use of search and destroy tactics, often involving very large operations in the jungles near South Vietnam?€™s western borders with Laos and Cambodia./p pMeanwhile he neglected other crucially important tasks, such as strengthening South Vietnam?€™s military forces and rooting out the covert infrastructure that enabled the enemy to use coercion and terror to dominate South Vietnam?€™s rural populace. He was successful in killing a large number of enemy troops, but this did not represent the progress he claimed; the communists simply replaced their losses and continued to fight. Westmoreland was on a treadmill./p pstrongQ:/strong What are the sources for your account of Westmoreland?€™s life and career?/p pstrongA:/strong Westmoreland himself provided extensive?€”and revealing?€”archival material. His papers, on deposit at the University of South Carolina, run to many thousands of pages. I spent four months going through them. /p pI interviewed about 175 people who had known and served with Westmoreland over the years. One of the most important, and most helpful, was General Bruce Palmer Jr., with whom I spoke dozens of times. Having been Westmoreland?€™s West Point classmate, then having served under him in Vietnam and subsequently as his Vice Chief of Staff, General Palmer was an authoritative, sympathetic, and invaluable source of both factual information and sensitive insights./p pstrongQ:/strong What do you hope will be the lasting impression of General Westmoreland?/p pstrong A:/strong It is not a happy story, but I believe it is an important, even essential, one. Unless and until we understand William Childs Westmoreland, we will never fully understand what happened to us in Vietnam, or why./p pIn the end, of course, this is the story of an officer whose strengths propelled him to a level of responsibility beyond his capacity. From early days prideful and image-conscious, Westmoreland developed into a man of incredible industry, driving himself to achieve, forever in a rush, with unbounded ambition and no apparent sense of personal limitations?€”doing it by the book, even though he hadn?€™t read the book or studied at any of the Army?€™s great schools. His ultimate failure would have earned him more sympathy, it seems certain, had he not personally been so fundamentally to blame by reason of his relentless self-promotion./p pThose who have long been Westmoreland admirers and supporters may be offended by an account that, as they will view it, tarnishes his reputation. But many others, I believe, will welcome a factual, detailed, and well-documented explanation of how and why he failed so completely in his most important assignment; what that failure cost us as a nation; and, most important, what it cost the ill-fated South Vietnamese, who risked all and lost all./p /p /p
undefined
My page chakrit is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com
CERTAIN CONTENT THAT APPEARS My page COMES FROM AMAZON SERVICES LLC. THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED ‘AS IS’ AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE OR REMOVAL AT ANY TIME.
